WEEK 3 · 3 HOURS

Logical Relationships and Formal Connectors

Focus: Cause · consequence · contrast · purpose

Use although, despite, as a result, therefore and in order to to build formal logical relationships.

Hour 1Input, visual explanation, listening
Hour 2Analysis, dialogue, interactive practice
Hour 3PC challenge, quiz, reflection
HOUR 1 · Input & Critical Comprehension60 MIN
Goal: Understand vocabulary, the visual concept and the listening message before producing academic language.
1A · Vocabulary Lab

Listen to every word. Choose four and create one climate-related sentence for each.

although
aunque
Although change is difficult, it is necessary.
despite
a pesar de
Despite the cost, the project can be beneficial.
as a result
como resultado
Emissions fell; as a result, air quality improved.
therefore
por lo tanto
The evidence is strong; therefore, action is justified.
in order to
con el fin de
Cities plant trees in order to reduce heat.
consequently
en consecuencia
Demand increased; consequently, prices rose.
whereas
mientras que
Solar is renewable, whereas coal is not.
nevertheless
no obstante
The plan is expensive; nevertheless, it may be necessary.
1B · Visual Explanation

Choose the connector by meaning

Identify the relationship first: CAUSE, CONSEQUENCE, CONTRAST or PURPOSE. Then choose a connector that expresses that relationship accurately.

Example 1

Although = contrast or concession.

Example 2

As a result = consequence.

Example 3

In order to = purpose.

1C · Listening First, Transcript Later

Before listening: Predict three academic words you may hear.

Question: Which relationships of contrast, consequence and purpose can you identify?

Although individual actions are important, they cannot replace large-scale policy. Governments can regulate emissions, whereas individuals mainly influence personal consumption. As a result, effective climate action requires cooperation at different levels. Cities may invest in public transport in order to reduce car dependence. Despite the initial cost, these projects can produce long-term benefits.
Hour 1 · Evidence & Submission
Student(s) for this hour
Hour 1 checklist
HOUR 2 · Analysis & Academic Interaction60 MIN
Goal: Analyze examples, interact with a partner and apply the unit concept through decisions rather than copying.
2A · Guided Dialogues

Listen, perform one dialogue, then replace one example with a climate issue from school, Villavicencio or Colombia.

Dialogue 1
Sara: Why did you use although?
Mateo: Because I wanted to show contrast between two true ideas.
Dialogue 2
Teacher: Can therefore introduce a purpose?
Student: No. It introduces a consequence.
Dialogue 3
Laura: The project is expensive. Nevertheless, it may be necessary.
Daniel: Good. The connector shows contrast without cancelling the first idea.
2B · Interactive Practice
Choose the logical relationship

Choose the best category. Then check your result before continuing.

2C · Pair Analysis & Submission
Student(s) for this hour
Hour 2 checklist
HOUR 3 · PC Challenge, Assessment & Reflection60 MIN
Goal: Apply the concept to a climate-action problem, complete the unit assessment and identify the next learning goal.
3A · PC Challenge + Quiz + Reflection
Student(s) for this hour
PC Challenge

Create a short academic response. Include a claim, evidence/example and one language structure from the unit. Student 2 must challenge or improve one part.

Unit Quiz

1. Which statement best matches the unit focus?

2. A strong academic argument should...

3. When evaluating evidence, students should...

4. Formal disagreement should...

5. A connector should be selected according to...

6. Before choosing an ICFES-style answer, students should...

Portfolio Reflection